January 26, 2012
BLOCKBUSTER REVELATION! – MINI Documentary – Illegal Obama “Propped Up” By Congress!
You gotta WATCH THIS !!!
OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW
http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138
OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW
By Craig Andresen on January 26, 2012 at 9:25 am
OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW
Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama.
The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.
Promptly at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.
The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.
With the small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seen fanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return of the attorneys and the appearance of the judge.
Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing in Las Vegas and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.
Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. He first tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevant to Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, under the law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later, that Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.
After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court, Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.
Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later telling Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate but that he would do so at his and his clients peril.
Game on.
5 minutes.
10 minutes.
15 minutes with the attorneys in the judge’s chambers.
20 minutes.
It appears Jablonski is not in attendance as the attorneys return, all go to the plaintiff table 24 minutes after meeting in the judge’s chambers.
Has Obama’s attorney made good on his stated threat not to participate? Is he directly ignoring the court’s subpoena? Is he placing Obama above the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to appear in court, would we or our attorney be allowed such action or, non action?
Certainly not.
Court is called to order.
Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.
Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.
Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966 or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.
Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.
June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.
Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and “Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs Happersett opinion.
It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs Happersett opinion.
The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have 2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.
Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.
Carl Swinson takes the stand.
Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case, laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and the challenge to it by Swinson.
2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the Georgia ballot and his candidacy.
Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.
Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.
RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.
DNC language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.
Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would not participate.
Dreams From My Father entered.
Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.
Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.
This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.
At this point, the judge takes a recess.
The judge returns.
David Farrar takes the stand.
Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.
Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.
Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing Obama’s last name something other than Obama.
State Licensed PI takes the stand.
She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social Security number for him from 1979. Professional opinion given that this number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1979, shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and should never have been used by Obama.
Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.
Next witness takes the stand.
This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop. He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original document.
Linda Jordan takes the stand.
Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.
Next witness.
Mr. Gogt.
Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.
Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document showing this, is considered to be a fraud.
States this is a product of layering.
Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.
Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by computer.
Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.
Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of MA. Obama never resided in MA. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.
Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.
Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr. Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual with regards to immigra
tion records.
Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.
Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen, he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.
Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.
Taitz takes the stand herself.
Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.
Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.
Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.
And with that, the judge closes the hearing.
What can we take away from this?
It’s interesting.
Now, all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY into court records.
One huge question is now more than ever before, unanswered.
WHO THE HELL IS THIS GUY?
Without his attorney present, Obama’s identity, his Social Security number, his citizenship status, and his past are all OFFICIALLY in question.
One thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under the definition of Natural Born Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions, to be eligible to serve as President.
What will the judge decide? That is yet to be known, but it seems nearly impossible to believe, without counter testimony or evidence, because Obama and his attorney chose not to participate, that Obama will be allowed on the Georgia ballot.
It also opens the door for such cases pending or to be brought in other states as well.
Obama is in it deep and the DNC has some…a LOT…of explaining to do unless they start looking for a new candidate for 2012.
January 19, 2012
HERO SHERIFF is now running for U.S. Congress in the TEXAS
Sheriff Richard Mack
Sheriff Richard Mack… HERO SHERIFF is now running for U.S. Congress in the TEXAS 21st Congressional District against Lamar Smith.The 21st District includes the entire area of the following counties: Real, Kerr, Bandera, Kendall, Comal, Gillespie, Blanco, Mason and Llano.The District includes partially, Travis and Bexar counties. …Support Sheriff Mack
http://www.sheriffmackforcongress.com/
• S…heriff lauded for standing up to feds on behalf of farmer
• Local sheriffs are traditionally responsible to the people
the people
http://www.americanfreepress.net/Issue_fronts/Issue_4_AFP_2012_1.pdf
January 17, 2012
Mitt Romney: Still Hunting for a Straight Answer
Worst answers possible:
The South Carolina Republican Party and Fox News sponsored a debate last night. One of the candidates gave one of the worst answers possible. It is an answer that should disqualify the candidate.
Who is the candidate and what was the question?
The candidate was Mitt Romney. The question was the whether he would have signed the National Defense Authorization Act (The NDAA). The NDAA is very controversial because of a provision in it that allows for the indefinite detention of Americas at Guantanamo.
The provision concerning indefinite detention of Americans was included at the request of the Obama regime. It is blatantly unconstitutional and hopefully will be declared so shortly.
Mitt Romney was asked if he would have signed that bill as President. Romney said he would. Then he said he would not misuse that power and he believed Barack Obama would not misuse it either.
What?
This is so mind blowing you have trouble even trying to figure out where to begin.
Our nation does have the right to detain enemy combatants who are captured on the battlefield. Those combatants should not have the right to have an attorney or go to court to challenge their detention.
However, that is as long as they are not American citizens.
If someone captured is an American citizen, a different set of laws applies, including various criminal laws, such as treason. An American citizen does have the right to file for Habeas Corpus. But the down side for such a person is they should be indicted, tried and in appropriate, given the death penalty.
However, Mitt Romney thinks there is nothing wrong with the NDAA. We just need to take his word that he would not abuse that power that the NDAA gives the president.
I suppose we should all believe that the check is in the mail too.
Given the number of flip-flops Mitt Romney has had, I知 not comfortable with his reassurances and no one else should be.
The idea of indefinite detention of American citizens is repugnant to the American Constitution. That is why our founding fathers specifically included the right to a fast, speedy and public trial by a jury of your peers. The right to the writ of Habeas Corpus is also specifically mentioned in the Constitution.
Liberty is under assault. The government and political class members do not like criticism and do not like democracy. Democracy is a messy experience. It is not a great system; it is simply better than the alternatives.
The fact that members of Congress and a President think this law was a good idea, ignoring the issues of Constitutionality, is simply stunning.
The fact that any Republican candidate would say this bill is a bill he would have signed is simply stunning.
Any Republican who would have signed such a bill, like Mitt Romney says he would, should not receive any serious consideration.
The fact Mitt Romney says he would not only sign such a bill but has no problems with giving this kind of unconstitutional power to a President, means he should never receive a vote from anyone who believes in freedom and liberty.
We must protect the protection.
A message to all members of Tea Party Nation
Visit Tea Party Nation at: http://www.teapartynation.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network |
December 30, 2011
December 20, 2011
December 8, 2011
April 6, 2011
Sheriff Mack: Nullify we Must, and Nullify we Will!
You have to watch this !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
April 28, 2011
What is it about twin girls born day after Obama?
Today, Barack Obama blinked – releasing birth records he has hired lawyers to prevent the public from seeing, even at the expense of allowing U.S. Army Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin to be court-martialed and sent to prison for having dared ask questions the White House until now has resolutely dismissed with ridicule and disdain.
A key problem for Obama is that birth certificates issued to twin girls born one day later at Kapi’olani hospital, the Nordykes, are the Rosetta Stone of deciphering both Obama’s previously released short-form Certification of Live Birth and the newly released purported copy of his long-form birth certificate.
Read more: What is it about twin girls born day after Obama? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292457#ixzz1KoZZFjZy
April 29, 2011
June 5, 2011
July 12, 2011
The 16th Amendment was not ratified!
The 16th Amendment was not ratified!
The Income Tax is therefore illegal
was not ratified! The Income Tax is therefore illegal.
Note: As goes our nation in the push by the Socialist Council on Foreign
Relations, so goes the rest of the “free” world. The CFR through its
enforcement arm, the Communist United Nations, will eventually eliminate all
freedom in this world. Only you and I can stop it. Removing the funding
provided directly by the US Taxpayer (all of our income taxes go out of the
country) will be a huge blow to the Elitists who seek to be the world
dictator thru the UN.{Philander Knox, Sec of State, 1909-1913, the Taft Administration,
proclaimed the 16th amendment to be ratified just a few days before he left
office in 1913 {sound familiar?}, to make way for the Wilson administration,
even though he knew it had not been legally ratified.
Philander Knox had for many years been the primary attorney for the richest
men in America, including Carnegie, Rockefeller, Morgan, the Vanderbilts,
the Mellons, and others. He had created for them the largest cartel in the
world, then was appointed, at their request, as the Attorney General in the
McKinley/Roosevelt administrations, where he refused to enforce the Sherman
anti-trust laws against the cartel he had just created.
The income tax amendment was pushed through Congress in 1909 by Sen Nelson
Aldrich, father-in-law of John D Rockefeller Jr, and grandfather and
namesake of Nelson A Rockefeller, and would not have been ratified if Knox
had not fraudulently proclaimed it so.
Example: Kentucky’s legislature rejected the amendment, but Knox counted
Kentucky as having approved it.
Example: Oklahoma’s legislature changed the amendment’s wording so that it
meant just the opposite of what was submitted to the states by Congress, but
Knox counted Oklahoma as approving the amendment. Minnesota did not submit
any results or copy of their vote to Knox, yet he counted Minnesota as
approving the amendment.}
The following is copied directly from the USA Today, 23 March 2001, Friday
Edition. Page 8A and The Washington Times National Weekly Edition, March
26-April 1. It is sponsored by: We The People Foundation For Constitutional
Education, Inc., http://givemeliberty.org, E-mail: acta@capital.net; Ph:
518-656-3578. Fax: 518-656-9724. This is an ongoing educational process
appearing in this “newspaper” and the Washington Times Weekly National
Edition. I will use the symbols { } to indicate notes, etc that I may
insert. The Symbols ( ) and [ ] are used in the original articles
and will be shown here.
QUOTE:
Q: Do you have to file a federal tax return or pay an income tax?
A: These Experts say “NO”! [There are then the pictures of Bill Benson,
Author: "The Law that Never Was"; Larken Rose, Author: "Taxable Income";
John Kotmair, Founder and Fiduciary, Save-a-Patriot Fellowship and Liberty
Works Radio Network]..
Read the Facts and Judge the truth for yourself.
>The original Constitution prohibits the Congress from laying a DIRECT
(income) tax on the People unless it is in PROPORTION to the states (the
last cnesus).
>Our income tax conflicts with the original constitution: it is a DIRECT
tax (the Supreme Court and numerous federal courts have declared it so) and
it has not been laid in PROPORTION to the states.
>The IRS {and that liberal biased authority on all things} (and the New
York Times) say our income tax, although DIRECT and UN-APPORTIONED, is
constitutional because the 16th amendment did away with the original
requirement that all DIRECT taxes must be in PROPORTION to the states.
>However, Bill Benson’s research shows, conclusively, that the 16th (income
tax) amendment is a FRAUD.-it was fraudulently ratified.
>When Mr Benson took his charge of FRAUD to federal court, the court
declared that it was a political question for Congress to decide, (Editor’s
note: since when if fraud a political question?)
>Even if the original constitution, or the constitution as amended by the
16th Amendment, authorized Congress to lay a DIRECT tax on all U. S.
Citizens, without APPORTIONMENT, Congress has not done so-Congress has yet
to pass a law that requires most Americans to file a tax return or to pay
income tax.
>The Current income tax law does NOT apply to most Americans. (Read More
Detailed Evidence at Our Website): http://www.givemeliberty.org
THE CONSTITUTIONAL ARGUMENT.
Bill Benson’s research report, “The Law That never Was” is based on
thousands of court-certified documents from state and federal archives. It
proves conclusively the 16th (income tax) amendment to the Constitution in
1913 was fraudulently ratified.
His report says, in effect, that every individual in America can legally
ignore requirements of the Internal Revenue Code because it is well settled
in American Jurisprudence that any law which is {in} conflict with the
Constitution is abrogated, i.e., it is VOID and can be IGNORED by the
people.
Mr Benson, a former Criminal Investigator for the Illinois Department of
Revenue, has NOT filed federal or state tax returns or paid any federal or
state tax on his income since 1986. {I know of two people in Crystal
River-one has not paid for over 5 years with no action by the IRS except for
the first year, where he refused to pay an illegal tax, and theother person
who took the IRS to Civil Court 14 years ago, and after spending $13,000,
representing himself in court, won against the IRS when they could not prove
that he had violated any law, and there was no law that required him to pay
a tax on income}.
THE STATUTORY ARGUMENT.
Un-refuted research by Larkin Rose and John Kotmair, say in effect, that
EVEN IF the Constitution authorized and income tax, the current income tax
laws do NOT APPLY AND DO NOT REQUIRE most U. S. Citizens to pay any taxes on
income.
Mr Rose has not filed federal or state income tax returns or paid income
taxes since 1996. Mr Kotmair has not filed federal or state income tax
returns or paid income taxes since 1973.
Q: Does the constitution prohibit a non-apportioned direct tax on the
People?
A: Yes! Here is what the original constitution says: “No capitation, or
other direct tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or
enumeration herein before directed to be taken.” See Article I, Section 9,
Clause 4.
Q: Is the individual income tax a direct tax? A: Yes. According to the
courts.
The U.S. Supreme Court as declared the tax to be a direct tax: “A proper
regard for its [the 16th Amendment's] genesis, as well as its very clear
language, requires also that this amendment shall not be extended by loose
construction, so as to repeal or modify, except as applied to income, those
provisions of the Constitution that require and apportionment according to
population for direct taxes upon property, real and personal.” See
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?navby=case&court=us&vol=252&page=189
note: Wages and Salaries are property. See: Sims v U.S. (1959), 359 U.S.
108.
The Federal Appeals Courts have declared The Income Tax to Be a Direct Tax.
“The sixteenth amendment merely eliminates the requirement that the direct
tax be apportioned among the states…The sixteenth amendment was enacted
for the express purpose of providing for a direct income tax.” See Parker v.
Commissioner, 724 F.2d 469, 471 5th Cir. 1984).
The court held that an argument that the income tax was an excise tax was
frivolous on its face. The court declared: “The power thus long predates the
Sixteenth Amendment, which did no more than remove the apportionment
requirement”. See Coleman v. Commission, 791 f.2d 68, 70 (7th Cir. 1986).
The cases cited by Francisco clearly establish that the income tax is a
direct tax…”, See United States v. Francisco, 614 f.2d 617, 619 (8th Cir.
1980).
“The sixteenth amendment remove any need to apportion income taxes among
the states that otherwise have been required by Article I, Section 9, Clause
4.” See United States v. Lawson, 670 F,2d 923, 927 (10th Cir, 1982).
STATE COURTS HAVE DECLARED THE INCOME TAX TO BE A DIRECT TAX.
Editor’s note: For a full discussion see: “Long after Brushaber vs. U. P.
Railroad and Stanton vs Baltic Mining, the courts have declared the income
tax to be a direct tax.” This article can be found on our web site. Special
thanks to constitutional attorney Larry Becraft upon whose research our
article is based.
Q. Is the individual income tax imposed “in proportion to the census.”
A. NO! It is not “in proportion to the census.”
The individual income tax is not tied to the population, state-by-state.
Notwithstanding the constitutional prohibition found in Article I, Section
9, Clause 4, the income tax it is not apportioned among the states.
Congress does not reqire each state to tax their citizens to collect the
money the federal government says it needs, {that is so that they can keep
buying votes, spending money on bridges we don’t need, donating 31 million
to The Washington Post for PR favors, and all the crap they waste money on}
over and above what it collects under the taxing authority granted to it
under Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution (indirect taxes, excise,
tariffs, duties and imposts).
Q. How can there be a direct, un-apportioned individual income tax in
America if the original constitution prohibits it?
A. The government relies upon the validity of the 16th Amendment to the
Constitution as its authority to impose the current, direct, un-apportioned
individual income tax.
The 16th Amendment reads: “The congress shall have power to lay and collect
taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among
the several states, and without regard to any census enumeration.” The IRS
says it is the 16th Amendment that gives it the authority to impose the
income tax directly on the working people of America. The IRS is on record
as saying; “The sixteenth amendment to the Constitution states that citizens
are required to file tax returns and pay taxes.” IRS Publication 1918 (July
96, Cat No 22524B. No less an authority than the New York Times {Ha, Ha,
Ha, yeah sure} says the 16th Amendment is the government’s authority to
impose tax directly on the working people of America. The New York Times
says: “Congress’s right to levy taxes on the income of individuals and
corporations was contested throughout the 19th century, but that authority
was written into the Constitution with the passage of the 16th Amendment in
1913.” The New York Times Almanac; 2001, The World’s Most Comprehensive and
Authoritative Almanac {snicker, snicker, yawn} page 161.
While refusing to address the question of its fraudulent adoption, the
federal courts have said the 16th Amendment is the government’s authority to
impose the income tax directly on the working people of America. For
instance Judge Paul G Hatfield, (United States District Court For the
District of Montana) wrote: “The income tax laws of the United States of
America are constitutional, having been validly enacted under the authority
of the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. “See United
States of America vs Jerome David Pederson, (1985) Case No. CR-84-57-GF. In
the United States v. Lawson the court declared: “The Sixteenth Amendment
removed any need to apportion income taxes among the states that otherwise
would have been required by Article I, Section 9, Clause 4.” See United
States vs Lawson, 670 F.2d 923 927 (10th Cir. 1982).
However, Bill Benson’s research report documents that the 16th Amendment
was not ratified by the states and is a fraud. Bill Benson’s findings,
published in “The Law That Never Was”, make a compelling case that the 16th
Amendment (the income tax amendment) was not legally ratified and that
Secretary of State Philander Knox was not merely in error, but committed
fraud when he declared it ratified in February 1913. For a discussion of
Philander Knox and his motives for fraudulently declaring the 16th Amendment
ratified, see: “Who was Philander Knox? Is it credible that he could have
committed fraud?” Which can be found on our web site. {He did commit fraud
because he did it to curry favor with the Morgans, Rothschilds,
Rockefellers, Mellons, {the cartel that he created} who subsequently hired
him}..
PROOF THAT STATES DID NOT RATIFY THE 16TH AMENDMENT.
In 1909, Congress passed the proposed 16th Amendment. It was sent to the
states for ratification by the state legislatures. There were 48 states.
Three-fourths, or 36, of them were required to give their approval in order
for it to be ratified.
Knox declared the 16th amendment ratified onFebruary 25, 1913, just a few
days before leaving office. He counted 38 states as having approved it.
>Kentucky: The Kentucky legislature rejected the amendment 33-9, but Knox
counted it as having passed 22-9.
>Oklahoma: Oklahoma voted for the amendment but changed the wording to mean
the opposite of the proposed amendment-even though a memo from chief legal
counsel Reuben Clark warned that states were not allowed to change the
proposed amendment.
>Tennessee: Tennessee violated its own state constitution when they failed
to delay the amendment vote until a new state legislature was elected. The
obvious reason for this state constitutional clause was to ensure that the
People of Tennessee would have direct political input on the federal
constitutional amendment process. Tennessee also violated their own state
constitution by failing to read the resolution on three different days as
prescribed by Article II, Section 28.
THESE STATE CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS MAKE THEIR APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT
NULL AND VOID.
>Texas and Louisiana: Texas and Louisiana violated provisions in their
states constitutions prohibiting the legislatures from empowering the
federal government with any additional taxing authority.
NOW THE NUMBER IS DOWN TO 33.
Twelve other states violated provisions in their State Constitutions,
bringing the number down to 21. Further evidence in Mr Benson’s research
report make the list dwindle down much more, but with the number to 21,
fifteen fewer than required, this is a suitable place to rest for the
purposes of this article. For a more detailed state-by-state account, to:
“How some States Failed to Ratify The Sixteenth Amendment”, which is located
on our web site. Special thanks to Bill Benson, upon whose research our
article is based.
THE CONGRESS AND THE COURTS HAVE PLAYED “GOVERNMENTAL PING-PONG WITH MR
BENSON’S CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE TO THE 16TH AMENDMENT.
In 1985, Mr Benson asked a federal court to declare the 16th amendment to
be null and void because it was fraudulently ratified. The court, instead
ruled the question to be a political question for the Congress to decide,
{well we know how our bloodsucking tax and spend congress looks at losing
any tax money to spend on those damned giveaways of our money and mine.
CLMsr} it said: “[Defendant] Stahl’s claim that ratification of the 16th
Amendment was fraudulently certified constitutes a political question becaue
we could not undertake independent resolution of this issue without
expressing lack of respect due coordinate branches of Government…”{my
question is how in hell can anyone respect our branches of government and
those leeches we have elected to office if they continue to allow this to go
one? CLMsr.} See U.S. v. Stahl (197\86), 792 F2nd 1438. Mr Benson then
pesonally delivered a copy of his voluminous research report to each and
every member of Congress. In response, the Congressional Research Service
immediately issued a report, which declared that the CRS was not going to
address the factual allegations of Mr Benson’s report and that the question
of the fraudulent adoption of the 16th Amendment was a question for the
Courts. (Now we see the ping-pong buck passing exercise the government
agencies are so very adept at. CLMsr.) For a copy of the CRS report, which
was written by a CRS attorney (Ripy), go to or Web Site.
Mr Benson has concluded that the 16th Amendment can be ignored, that
Congress’s power to lay a DIRECT (income) tax on the People is, limited by
the original Constitution (Article I, Section 9, Clause 4), and that because
the income tax has not been laid in proportion to the states he has a
fundamental right to ignore the income tax laws. He has not filed an income
tax return or paid income tax since 1986.
REGARDLESS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL INFIRMITIES OF THE CURRENT INCOME TAX LAW,
THE TAX LAW AS WRITTEN DOES NOT APPLY TO MOST AMERICANS LIVING AND WORKING
IN THE UNITED STATES. Some evidence:
1..Sections 1461 and 7701 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “IRC”)
establish that the only person made liable to withhold and pay the income
tax is a withholding agent, who is any person required to withhold under
sections 1441-1443, which pertain only to nonresident aliens and foreign
entities.
2..Look in the IRC index under “income tax” to cross-reference with
“citizen” or “citizenship”. There are only two entries: one for citizens
departing the U.S. and the other for citizens living abroad. But if one
cross-references “income tax” with “aliens”, there are several PAGES of
entries, most of them under subcategory “nonresident alien” where we find
all the familiar terms, such as “deductions”, “exemptions,” “gross income”,
and “withholding”. Careless indexing? Ask your tax professional.
3..Form 1040 has never been authorized by the Office of Management and
Budget (“OMB”) to be used under Section 1 of the IRC. The only form ever
approved for use under Section 1 is Form 2555, titled “Foreign Earned
Income.”
4..A statement of citizenship, in duplicate, from a worker has always
served to relieve an employer of duty to withhold income taxes from ANY
worker’s pay, under Section 1.1441-5, and Publication # 515 (wording was
altered in 1999 to disguise the provision).
5..The Internal Revenue Manual instructs the employees of the IRS that the
Criminal Investigation Division is under the direction of the International
Branch of the IRS and is only authorized to enforce criminal statutes
applicable to taxes for U. S. Citizens residing in foreign countries and
nonresident aliens required to file federal income tax.
6..IRS revenue officers are authorized by law to conduct only civil
enforcement under subtitle E (alcohol, tobacco, and firearms), not under
subtitle A (income taxes). Among assertions by former IRS agents is that
virtually everything a revenue officer does is outside the Law.
7..Code section 6020(b), invoked by the IRS when it assesses income tax on
individuals who have not filed a 1040, does not authorize them to assess
income tax on individuals. Delegation Orders from the Commission to IRS
employees authorizing them to execute returns for persons required to file,
but who didn’t, do not include Forms 1040 or 2555 on the list of authorized
returns.
8..Regulations implementing the statutes governing tax liens and levies are
under the jurisdiction of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms
{another damned Gestapo agency. CLMsr.}. and not the IRS.
9..Social Security officials confirmed that there is no law that requires a
citizen to get a social security number, for an employer to get an employer
identification number, or for either of them to participate in social
security and pay employment taxes under subtitle C, unless they want to
participate in the Social Security program. No law requires an employer to
insist on getting a W-4 from a worker, nor for a worker to fill it out.
Without a social security number, a worker can have no taxable income,
according to the Social Security Administration. On 2/20/01, in an EEOC
case in the Norfolk area, a worker prevailed in a Title VII Civil Rights
action after being fired for not providing a social security number, when
the employer only needed to notify the IRS that it had requested one. You
can see a copy of the letter from the SSA on our web site.
10.IRC Section 3402 imposes withholding only upon “wages” as defined
exclusively at Sections 3401(a) and 3401(a)(8)(A), which reveals the
remuneration paid to U.S. Citizens living and working in the U.S. is
excepted from the definition of “wages” that are subject to withholding
under Section 3402. The only way it can be “wages” is under IRC Section 911,
i.e., remuneration in U. S. possessions.
11.IRC Section 3403 indemnifies and protects employers from liability for
the withheld remuneration only if it is “wages” under Section 3401(a).
12.Senator {Daniel K} Inoye {of Hawaii}, in a letter responding to an
inquiry to a constituent who was a tax consultant, stated, “Based on
research performed by the Congressional Research Service, {Remember Ms Karen
Thurman, Democrat Rep, 5th Dist, Florida, this is the same CRS that just
this year-2001, told you just the opposite which you relayed to me by
letter?}, there is no provision which specifically and unequivocally
requires an individual to pay income taxes.” {Ms Thurman,}You can see a copy
of this letter and comments on our website. {Now this is very interesting,
because when I queried my state representative, a Democrat, Ms Karen
Thurman, she sent back a response that said that the Congressional Research
Services says it is a valid tax and I sure had better pay it. It looks as if
the CRS gives the answer that is expected of them. CLMsr}
13.The definition of “gross income,” found in IRC 61 and 26 CFR1.61-1(a)
defines gross income as “all income from whatever source derived, unless
excluded by law.” IRC 61 defines gross income as “all income from whatever
source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items: (1)
Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and
similar items: (2) Gross income derived from business; (3) Gains derived
from dealings in property; (4) Interest; (5) Rents; (6) Royalties; (7)
Dividends; (8) Alimony;…(15) Income from an interest in an estate or
trust. Tax researchers have discovered that “items” of income in IRC 61 are
not the same as “sources” of income. CFR 1.861-1 says: “Section 861 et
seq…and the regulations thereunder, determine the sources of income for
purposes of the income.” The specific sources listed in CFR 1.861-8(f)(1).
They are: (1) over-all limitation to foreign tax credit; (2) international
and foreign sales corporations; (3) non-resident alien individuals and
foreign corporations engaged in trade or business within the U. S.;
(4)foreign base company income; and (5)a list of fifteen other operative
section-all foreign. All this lead to the conclusion that the term “gross
income” does not apply to the income of most citizens but to the incomes of
nonresident aliens and U.S. citizens earning money abroad, a conclusion no
longer very surprising after considering all the other evidence presented
above. Editor’s note: This “861 Sources” argument is a very potent but
complex legal argument. For a FREE detailed discussion of this argument, see
our website article, “GROSS INCOME AND SECTIONS 861: TAX RESEARCHERS
PERSPECTIVE AND EXPLANATION IN THE CONTEXT OF OTHER STATUTES AND
REGULATIONS.” Special thanks to Larken Rose and John Kotmair.
WHAT IF?
What if individuals were to stop filing and paying the income tax and
employers were to stop withholding the tax from the paychecks fo their
employees and there was not federal tax to take the place of the individual
income tax? Would we be able to “fix the bridges and maintain a strong
national defense?” Would we be able to avoid “chaos”? Would we be a
stronger nation? Is a mechanism in place that would allow a peaceful and
smooth transition from a society with an individual income tax to a society
without one? {most people don’t know that all of the income taxes they pay
goes to the bankers that make up the FED, all members of the Council on
Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission. None of it goes to pay for
the “services” we get from the federal govt. CLMsr}
THE ANSWER TO EACH AND EVERY ONE OF THESE QUESTIONS IS A RESOUNDING “YES”.
Here we are in the year 2001, and the federal government is preparing to
adopt the federal budget for the next fiscal year. Let’s assume that the
Congress will come to the conclusion that it wants two trillion dollars in
tax revenue next year. Let’s also assume that Congress expects one trillion
dollars to come from the taxes already in place and authorized by Article I,
Section 8 of the Constitution (excise taxes, tariffs, duties, and imposts),
and that those tax revenues were sufficient (as is the case today) to
maintain a strong defense and to pay for the other federal programs needed
and authorized by the enumerated powers found in Article I. That leaves one
trillion dollars to come from someplace else to pay for everything else
Congress wants to do. Assuming Congress decides not to increase the Article
I, Section 8 taxes, Congress would have to get the other trillion dollars by
taxing the People under the authority granted by Article I, Section 9 of the
Constitution-i.e., by laying a direct tax on the people, a tax that would
have to be PROPORTIONED AMONG THE STATES. This means Congress would have to
pass a bill and the President would have to sign the bill into law,
requiring the states to come up with the money Congress wanted. To be
constitutional, the bill would have to proportion the one trillion dollars
among the 50 states, based on the population figures of the last census.
This is the mechanism that has been in place since 1787, and which could
very easily work today.
Of course, with this approach to funding the federal government, there
would be a dramatic shift in power away from the federal
government to the States and to the People. {members of congress are so
entrenched, so self-serving, so dedicated to tax and spend, so destructive
of our Constitution, about the only way we could make this work would be to
eliminate about half of them. That way the other half would get the message
and return this nation to We The People…maybe..CLMsr}.
It can safely be assumed that if given the choice, the States will use
their power to influence the federal government not to adopt the law
requiring the states to come up with the trillion dollars, deciding,
instead, that they, the states don’t need the middle man-i.e., that they
will fund the development of communities of their states, and that they will
fund the education of the children of their states, without also funding the
huge {bloated, conceited, leeches. CLMsr} bureaucracies in DC.
{snip of non-essential comments}.
Freedom is not a spectator sport. These ads costs tens of thousands of
dollars. If you want to see more of these PLEASE HELP. If every concerned
citizen could contribute just a few dollars we can reach millions and end
this tyranny. Donations are: Confidential, protected by a bonded CPA firm,
and {ironic isn’t it.CLMsr}, are tax deductible {to the extent of the law.
CLMsr}. Address: 2458 Ridge Road, Queensbury, New York, 12804. WEBSITE:
www.givemeliberty.org. Wire transfers: We The People Account #324220020998,
ABA route # 021300077. Buy reprints of this ad in full size & color at:
$50.00 for 500. Ph: 518-656-3578.
{snip of material related and dated to things that happened on 23 March 2001
deleted now as past tense. CLMsr}
This message is part of Project TOTO, a plan to educate millions of
citizens (along with accountants, tax attorneys, legislators, judges, IRS
employees, and prospective jurors) about the true nature of the income tax
laws, to expose operations of the IRS that are unauthorized by law, and to
put an end to their illegal collection of taxes from people who do not owe
them. Jefferson said it best: “When the government fears the people, you
will have liberty. When the people fear the government, you will have
tyranny.” {Hey People, what do we gave NOW? CLMsr.} Sponsored by We The
People Foundation for Constitutional Education, Inc., 2458 Ridge Road,
Queensbury, NY. 12804. www.givemeliberty.org E-mail: acta@capital.net
Fax: 518-656-9724. EndQuote.
{I certify that the afore quoted dialogue is an exact copy of the articles
that appeared in the newspapers identified at the onset of this discussion,
except that underlining was left out, and notes of mine indicated by { } are
included.}
Constitutional Limitations on Taxing Power.
In order to understand why paying income tax and filing tax forms are
voluntary actions for individuals, it is essential to understand the
limitations on federal taxation embodied in the United States Constitution.
The statesmen who wrote the Constitution were fully aware of the dangers to
liberty in allowing a central government to impose taxes directly upon
individuals or upon property.
The framers of the Constitution included not one, but two limitations in
the Constitution that forbid the federal government to impose any direct
taxes upon individuals or upon property. All direct taxes are required to be
“apportioned,” which means that they must be laid upon the state governments
in proportion to each states population. Another words, if one person owes
$10, all persons owe $10 not $10,000 or $100,000.
The limitations forbidding direct taxation of individuals are found first
in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3, which states: “Representatives and direct
Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included
within this Union, according to their respective Numbers…” and again in
Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4, which states: “No Capitation, or other
direct Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration
here in before directed to be taken.” These basic sections of the
Constitution have never been repealed or amended. The Constitution still
forbids direct taxation of individuals and property.
In the past, America prospered and became the greatest and richest country
in the world when individuals paid no income tax and governments revenues
were raised by constitutionally authorized taxes on certain goods and
services and on corporations. But now, money is taken from the productive
sector of society by the income tax to support the non-productive sector,
foreign aid, give-aways and a bloated, needless bureaucracy. The income tax
paid by citizens sharply reduces their earnings, thus they buy less, causing
business to decline, leading to unemployment and depression which lowers the
standard of living for all Americans. The income tax has created havoc in
America’s economy, in addition to the loss of liberty and the harassment of
our people by the IRS’s oppressive collection tactics. The collection of
the income tax enforced by fear and intimidation, it is as un-American as
the origin of the income tax itself.
A graduated income tax is the second plank of Karl Marx Communist
Manifesto. Deceiving citizens into voluntarily subjecting themselves to a
tax they do not owe is FRAUD. And when individuals who do voluntarily
subject themselves to the income (excise) tax by filing returns, have
assessments of tax laid on them directly by the IRS, it is a blatant
violation of the constitutional limitation forbidding the direct taxation of
individuals. If the IRS then confiscates the individuals wages or property
by levy and seizure to settle the unconstitutionally laid tax claims, the
action is pure theft under color of law.
The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land. It was written to
create a government of limited powers for the primary purpose of securing
citizens rights to life, liberty and property. The Declaration of
Independence states that it is the duty of citizens to oppose and resist
abuses of their rights. These violations of citizens rights can be stopped
if enough people become informed of these facts.
The Constitution is a precious document of our heritage of freedom. Its
guarantees of liberty are only as effective as the will of the people to
enforce them.
Your labor is your property. Knowledge will give you the power to protect
and enjoy all the fruits of your labors.
Make no mistake what the founding fathers would do today if they were
serving in Congress. Impeachment proceedings would begin this very day and
continue night and day. Those not impeached would be hanged for treason.
Wake Up America!!!!!!!!!!!! Today, the Congress and the President, and the
entire judicial system is a disgrace to our country.
We have a Constitution and our Bill of Rights (the first 10 amendments)
that makes us free. Right? Then visit:
http://www.trimonline.orghttp://www.getusout.org
http://www.thenewamerican.comhttp://www.givemeliberty.org
http://www.jbs.orghttp://www.getawarrant.com
Then take a look at these sites: http://www.dixierising.com
http://www.dixienet.orghttp://www.palmetto.org
http://www.southerncaucus.orghttp://www.spofga.org
http://www.southern-style.comhttp://www.nca.mybravenet.com
{ Only Notes 1 & 2 are duplicates of previous messages text. All text
preceding these notes is new. }
NOTE # 1: This is the TWENTIETH doc in a string of about 22 regarding the
Income Tax, How it was illegally forced upon us, the collusion of various
nation banks, including The Bank of England, the Banks of Europe, the Banks
of the USA that make up the Non-Government organization known as the Fed and
the bankers themselves dedicated to making this a Socialist Nation. As David
Rockefeller reportedly said in 1973 when he and others formed the Trilateral
Commission, “We will have this a Socialist Nation by the end of the year
2000.” Well, with the help of our past Communist President, he damned well
nearly did it. If Comrade Gore had been elected, it would be now! The last
doc in this series is a plan that was presented to President Bush when he
visited Florida recently. It was put directly into his hands. He has not
acted upon it. We The People must initiate a campaign of letters, faxes,
e-mails, and phone calls to him and others in our otherwise corrupt
government letting them know of our displeasure. For God and Country, Chet.
NOTE # 2: [ Should you wish to be removed from my mailing list, please
send a message with the word remove in the subject line. If you got this
from a mail list, such as xxxxxx@xxxxxgroups.com or something like that,
then it is up to the moderator or owner of the list to remove my access
based upon complaints of my material, abuse, or removal of your access if
you request it. ] Should you wish a copy of a numbered message
(this is the 20th one) that you may have missed, please e-mail me off net
for a copy of it and I will be very happy to provide it. Chet.
You may forward this to every member of Congress by using a Mail Blaster
application available on the Internet as follows:
Step 1. Access your web browser. Step 2. Type in the search block:
http://www.mailblasterdot.com
Step 3. Click on Send Batch E-Mail which is on the left end of the
screen.
Step 4. Type in your E-mail Address. Step 5. Click on Subject: Type in
the subject of your document.
Step 6. Click on Message: Now here you can type in your message or you can
paste a previously copied file here. You can also edit your message after
you finish with the message and before sending it.
Step 7. Then click on select a file. Here you may click on:
demhouse.txt (Socialist Democrat House Members) or,
democsen.txt (Socialist Democrats Senate Members) or,
newsorg.txt (Many of the “anchor” news folks have their email address here
for you to use) or,
rephouse.txt (Republican House of Representatives Members) or,
repubsen.txt (Republican Senate Members) or,
senators.txt (All Senators).
Step 8. After selecting the group to receive your message then click on
send batch. It will go to everyone listed in the batch.
Remember: Nothing beats a letter AND a phone call.
A
Chester L McWhorter Sr, c/o 504 N. Brighton Rd, Lecanto, Occupied Florida,
C.S.A. 34461. Ph: 352-344-9073. Fax: Same. E-mail:
robertthebruce@naturecoast.net
20 of 38…. 100.0.8.0 End.
“Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the
citizenry into a patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged
sword. It both emboldens the blood, just it narrows the mind. And when the
drums of war have reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and
the mind has closed, the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of
the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by
partiotism, will offer up all of their rights unto the leader and gladly so.
How do I know? For this is what I have done. And I am Caesar.”–Julius
Caesar.
August 10, 2011
Alaska never had a AAA rating till Sarah Palin took over as Governor!
Alaska never had a AAA rating till
Sarah Palin took over as Governor!
Want an “upgrade” again?
Elect someone who has done it before!
Elect Palin! Urge her to run.
Announce after the September!
http://alanpetersnewsbriefs.blogspot.com/2011/08/sarah-palin-comments.html
Monday, August 08, 2011
August 20, 2011
Arizona sheriff promises Obama-eligibility probe
Arizona sheriff promises Obama-eligibility probe http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=335261#ixzz1VUt5SsPL
 From left to right, WND’s Jerome Corsi, Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Surprise, Ariz., tea party leaders Julie Wise, Jim Wise and Jeff Lichter |
MARICOPA COUNTY, Ariz. – At the request of tea party leaders in Arizona, famed Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has promised to investigate the validity of Barack Obama’s purported long-form birthcertificate in a determination of the president’s eligibility for the county’s 2012 election ballot.
Tea party leaders in Surprise, Ariz., met with Arpaio and WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi Thursday morning to express concern that a fake birth certificate would be used to document the president’s eligibility to run in Maricopa County, where Arpaio is the chief law enforcement officer.
Arpaio’s tough crackdown on illegal immigration has made him a national figure.
At a one-hour meeting in Arpaio’s office, the tea party leaders presented the sheriff with a petition that was drafted after a speech by Corsi the previous night. Corsi, author of a best-selling book challenging Obama’s eligibility, “Where’s the Birth Certificate?”, presented evidence from numerous computer-imaging specialists who believe the document presented by the White House April 27 is not authentic.
At the gathering Wednesday night of more than 325 people, sponsored by the Surprise Tea Party Patriots of Surprise, Ariz., and the Liberty Through Action organization, 242 signatures were gathered on the petition, which requested that Arpaio begin a criminal investigation.
Read more: Arizona sheriff promises Obama-eligibility probe http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=335261#ixzz1VUs8XtIh
The petition calls for the sheriff to investigate the possibility that a crime has been committed against the Arizona secretary of state, who must decide whether to put Obama’s name on the ballot.
Arpaio told the tea party leaders the complaint is within his jurisdiction, and he will be forced to investigate. He said he expects political pressure, but he pointed out that as the chief law enforcement officer of Maricopa County, he’s taken an oath to respond to citizens who approach him about enforcing the law.
Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Lt. Justin Griffin confirmed to WND that Arpaio is “waiting to receive all the documentation and all the investigative material from Dr. Jerry Corsi, and then he will look into the matter and compare it to the Arizona revised statutes.”
The petition states:
We the undersigned citizens are respectfully requesting that you initiate a criminal investigation under the authority of A.R.S. 13-2407 A-C, Into the alleged Certificate of Live Birth, File Number 151 61 10641, State of Hawaii, for Barack H. Obama II. The document was released on April 27, 2011, by the White House to the press and posted on the White House website and distributed and downloaded by computer throughout the nation, including within Maricopa County. Reportedly, several experts have declared the document to be a forgery. Reportedly, the file number may be out of sequence; “THE” appears to be misspelled as “TXE” in the State Registrar’s stamp; there appears to be a “smiley face” in the “A” in the Alvin T. Onaka, State Registrar stamp; reportedly the document has computer generated, multiple layers and is not a copy of a single layered document; font types appear to vary throughout the document, reportedly, not possible with a vintage 1961 mechanical typewriter. We urge you to continue to support the Rule of Law and to investigate and determine whether the alleged Certificate of Live Birth, for Barack H. Obama II, File Number 151 61 10641, is a forgery or an authentic document. A.R.S. 13-2407 A-C, declares that tampering with a public record is a class 6 felony.
“I think what we’ve seen is history created today,” said Surprise tea party leader Brian Reilly. “This is probably the first time in this country that citizens have gone to a sheriff over a national issue.”
Reilly said he’s “extremely grateful” that Arpaio will look into the matter is “hopeful that this will achieve what we’re expecting to achieve on this issue, which is the truth.”
“We’re trying to get to the truth,” he emphasized.
November 21, 2011
Hollywood Producer Speaks Out Against Massive Obama and DNC Corruption
Bettina Sofia Viviano, We Will Not Be Silenced
ALERT: Hollywood Producer Speaks Out
Against Massive Obama and DNC Corruption
What would have seemed unlikely—if not impossible as the fear of doing so was too great—three years ago, is beginning to happen today. Some successful in Hollywood are actually speaking out against Dictator-in-Chief Obama and the now totally corrupt Marxist-Democrat Party.
As with the commencement of all pro-liberty movements, only the most courageous amongst us first step into the fray. The others follow after they believe it is safer to do so. The brave one, this time, is producer and now screenwriter Bettina Sofia Viviano. Through a series of events, I met Bettina and that led to the following interview. I believe many if not most will find it eye-opening and extremely revealing.
The Interview
Sher: Bettina, first of all thank you so much for your time. You are one of the seemingly fewer and fewer Conservative producers in Hollywood who has been very successful and who has also added very successful script-writing to your quiver including your latest film Jack & Jill starring Adam Sandler and opening 11 November.
When we talked last week, you told me that you had no interest in politics until the 2008 general elections. Please tell my readers the story of what changed both your attitude and perspective towards the current US political theater.
Bettina: Back in 2008, I had never even voted in my life. I wasn’t registered to vote, and I probably didn’t even know how many Congressman the US has. I knew that, being in the film business, I was SUPPOSED to be a far left Democrat or face being blackballed and abused by my colleagues. So, I just didn’t bother with it. Why bother if you really have no choice anyway?
Then a writer/director client of mine, a Democrat, called me and asked me if I wanted to produce a documentary about voter fraud in the Democratic Primary with her. She had received a phone call from a very well known Congressional Investigator in Washington, who told her that the Hillary campaign had launched serious allegations against the Obama campaign for caucus fraud. We saw a letter from Hillary’s lawyer in DC, Lynn Utrecht, and sure enough there was something there.
When the director, Gigi Gaston, first told me about this…I couldn’t have been less interested. Really? Caucus fraud? Who cares. I wasn’t political and I didn’t have a dog in the Hillary/Obama race anyway. However, it was one of those split second decisions that changes the entire course of one’s life. For some reason, I agreed to do it and my life has never been the same. What we saw…the ugly, vicious, nasty voter fraud committed by the Obama camp, the DNC and ACORN, has scarred me for life. The entire time we were going across the country interviewing people who had experienced and witnessed the fraud, I could only feel that America was a third world, banana republic like Cuba. In fact Brad Sherman, a California Congressman, told one of my partners on the film that “there was so much fraud in the Democratic Primary that we look like a banana republic.” He of course refused to say it on camera, but they all knew what happened. All of them. And the fact that no one stood up against this fraud, and in many instances criminal acts, appalled me. What they did to Mrs. Clinton was beyond disgraceful, and in the end we proved that by all accounts she really did win the nomination. Imagine what a different country this would be right now had she won. She might be a far left Democrat like Obama, but the big differences are that she is competent and doesn’t hate this country as he does.
Sher: After you had begun filming the documentary “We Will Not Be Silenced,” you discovered that Barack Hussein Obama’s fraud permeated virtually everything he did politically…from using his group ACORN to commit extreme election fraud to his usage of the New Black Panthers wielding weapons to intimidate voters. The fraud begins with Obama’s stealing votes and support from Hillary Clinton for the 2008 Democrat nomination. Would you give us the details of how this patently ugly and deviant picture unfolded?
Bettina: We started investigating the caucus fraud that was reported in 14 caucus states. There were 2000 complaints in Texas ALONE. Along with those claims, there were as I said a lot of criminal complaints as well at the police stations. What we found in every state was that the stories were always the same. People reporting vandalism, threats, death threats, fraud, falsified documents, lock outs, intimidation, you name it…all directed at the Hillary voters. And the worst part was that the ACORN/Obama campaign/DNC thugs weren’t really hiding it from anyone.
I think that Democrats always justify their fraud with moral relativity. They think that what they are doing is for “everyone’s own good” so the end justifies the means. We saw such blatant disregard for human beings, personal property, the laws of our country, and civil society in general that I was truly horrified. So many people we interviewed were scared to come forward, whether due to threats of losing their lives, their jobs, or being thrown out of the Democratic Party. I just kept thinking…who the hell do these people think they are? They are blatantly and openly committing the most heinous acts of voter fraud, threats, intimidation, and they don’t care. If I brought this fraud up to my Democrat friends, the only thing they said to me was “well BUSH did it too.” But, oddly, this wasn’t Republican on Democrat voter fraud. This was the Democrats eating their own.
Sher: On a lighter note, recently Dictator Obama’s team established his latest snitch website “Attackwatch.com.” Apparently, if anyone tells the truth about Obama they are to be reported to members of the still-growing Obama Police State. I understand that it was taken offline for awhile but, like all of the undead, it’s back! Many conservatives and others reported themselves but, I found your story particularly hilarious. Please tell the readers what you did to report yourself.
Bettina: I have basically had it with the Obama Regime and their snooping on people, trying to silence dissent, attempting to quash the First Amendment. They, again, would love to silence everyone so we can live in some hopey dopey world where no one’s opinions are welcome unless they kiss Obama’s rear end. When Obama put that “Something’s Fishy” nonsense on the White House website, I felt like I was living in Venezuala or Cuba. Everyone was supposed to “report their friends and neighbors who say negative things about Obamacare.” WHAT? “Report” them? OMG this really had become Hitler Germany. So, rather than wait for one of my friends or neighbors to report how much I hated Obama and his disgusting, vile, ridiculous “destroy America” piece of garbage legislation, DEATHCARE, I decided to just report MYSELF.
I called the White House message line, got a live operator, told her I hate Obama and Obamacare, and that I had my bag packed for the FEMA Camp if she wanted to send someone to come get me. Surprisingly, she laughed and giggled and hung up. I really was waiting for the Secret Service visit but it never came. Which kind of angers me because I have Facebook friends who have made very benign comments about Obama and have received the visits from the guys in the black SUVs. I guess you haven’t arrived until you have been the recipient of Obama’s attempt to shut everyone up.
Sher: Working in Hollywood, you have a unique perspective. What are you hearing about Obama’s continuation of his destructive tenure that you can share with us?
Bettina: I try not to discuss politics that much with my friends in Hollywood. They are all great people, but sometimes I wonder if they even know why they are liberals. I mean, it has come down to the fact that you just CAN’T support Obama and his criminal regime, no matter what party you are in. It’s too bad, because the Democrats signed their own death warrant by taking down Hillary for Obama. We warned them, and now I see a ton of buyer’s remorse. I will say this…In public you will never get anyone in Hollywood to discuss Obama’s disastrous “Presidency.” They know it would be career suicide to tell the truth. But, when I have private conversations with my friends, they admit he is a failure and was a mistake. Three years ago I warned everyone that Obama was the biggest threat to our safety, security and prosperity and I am sadly right.
Sher: Thanks so much, Bettina. Is there anything else you’d like to share with the readers?
Bettina: This has been an incredibly eye-opening three years for me. I think we can all agree that the direction of our country has been hideous and that this is possibly the last chance we have to repair the damage. I would just like to say to your readers…Get involved. This is critical to the survival of our country. The best thing people can do is get active; become poll watchers in their precincts, because the ACORN people are out there already, getting ready to steal another election. Obama’s numbers are so bad, that we know there is no logical way for him to win in 2012. The fraud will be huge, just like it was in 2008. Please, people, don’t stay home. Support the GOP candidate…donate your time and money…and volunteer at your polling location. This is the most important fight of our lifetime. The one thing I can say about my fellow Americans who have decided to join the fight to save our country…Democrats really underestimate the power of the American Spirit.
We Will Not Be Silenced:
We Will Not Be Silenced – Part 1:
Attackwatch.com:
